Football players must be educated
The biggest battle is for sports equipment manufacturers like Adidas, Puma and Nike, who have largely been successful in capturing major footballing nations such as France, Germany, Brazil and Cameroon, former African football champions. .
Sometimes the battle enters the teams of these nations. It was reported in 1998 that Nike forced then world star striker Ronaldo de Lima to play in the final despite his illness.
Unofficial reports said Nike was the one to take care of it Ronaldo, who suffered a concussion and was treated in hospital, played the final game against France but the illness was evident as the day went on. saw the shadow of the attacker, nicknamed “phenomenon”, and Brazil lost 3-0 to France.
Companies also compete at the club level. Adidas was reportedly largely responsible for signing midfielder Paul Pogba to Manchester United after the European giants lacked a star footballer to sell jerseys and other equipment, especially to youngsters.
This has not been made public, but speculation has been high and Adidas has not commented.
Likewise, other reports suggest that Nike clashed with Manchester United after deciding to sell Cristiano Ronaldo to Real Madrid, who are dressed in Adidas. The source of Nike’s departure from Manchester United is said to be the dispute.
Even Piere Emerick Aubameyang’s signing to Arsenal was made by Adidas after the London club didn’t have a big name for the kit.
All of this information has never been official, possibly due to the strict rules and regulations governing the football industry, which means that the direct involvement of a sponsorship company or deciding who to play raises doubts in the game. spirit of game managers and other participants.
But the situation here seems to be going from bad to worse.
Last week, a debate erupted over GSM Group sponsorship of a club other than Yanga after the owner of the company allegedly helped several clubs avoid financial bankruptcy.
Simba SC executives have not spoken about the issue, but some of the fanatics at the Msimbazi Street club have spoken out to show that it is the point on their side.
Yanga also responded by proving that even Mohamed Dewji’s company that invested in Simba SC namely Mohamed Enterprises sponsored another club last season and so they are wondering why Simba SC fanatics are now complaining after seeing the GSM group financially support the NBC Premier League.
It is not an offense for a company to sponsor more than one club in a league.
It’s very common and that’s why I tried to show at the beginning how these big companies in the world sponsor teams or clubs in the same league and there is no problem with that.
Even here Simba and Yanga are sponsored by SportPesa and were previously sponsored by Kilimanjaro Premium Lager and there was no problem, let alone Azam Media’s TV rights which apply to all clubs through the Tanzania Federation of football (TFF).
Perhaps the problem could be the involvement of employees or high-ranking figures in these companies, as well as their involvement in the major activities of the club when they are the ones who make the biggest decisions in their companies.
If MeTL sponsors a club other than Simba, then its owner, Mohamed Dewji, becomes the chairman of the board of Simba holding around 49% of the shares, then there is a problem.
If Hersi Said, the director of investments of the GSM group and assistant to the owner of the company, Ghalib Said Mohamed, becomes vice-president of the registration committee of Yanga and gets heavily involved in operational activities, maybe even more as the general manager of the outfit, then there is a problem.
They both manage their self-confidence when choosing to embark on their activities at the club.
The key is for football governing body officials to realize that until both offenders get to the point of criticizing their infractions, there is an issue that needs to be addressed with a strong directive or regulation that eliminate conflicts of interest.