Why win-wins are rare in complex environmental management
Nelson, E. et al. Modeling of multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production and trade-offs at the landscape scale. Front. School. About. 74–11 (2009).
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, BL Global food demand and sustainable agricultural intensification. proc. Natl Acad. Science. United States 10820260–20264 (2011).
Mueller, ND et al. A compromise frontier for global nitrogen use and grain production. About. Res. Lett. 9054002 (2014).
Costello, C. et al. Global prospects for fisheries under contrasting management regimes. proc. Natl Acad. Science. United States 1135125–5129 (2016).
Burgess, MG et al. Protect marine mammals, turtles and birds by rebuilding the world’s fisheries. Science 3591255-1258 (2018).
Pascual, U. et al. Social equity is important in payments for ecosystem services. Biosciences 641027-1036 (2014).
Muradian, R. et al. Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal appeal of win-win solutions. Conserv. Lett. 6274-279 (2013).
Hopkins, SR et al. How to identify win-win interventions that benefit human health and conservation. Nat. To support. 4298-304 (2021).
Birkenbach, AM, Smith, MD & Stefanski, S. Dossier—taking stock of catch shares: lessons from the past and directions for the future. Rev. About. Econ. Politics 13130-139 (2019).
Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. The agroecological matrix as an alternative to the land conservation/agricultural intensification model. proc. Natl Acad. Science. United States 1075786–5791 (2010).
Howe, C., Suich, H., Vira, B. & Mace, GM Creating win-win from compromise? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of the trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in the real world. Global. About. Change 28263–275 (2014).
Hajjar, R. et al. A comprehensive analysis of the social and environmental outcomes of community forests. Nat. To support. 4216-224 (2021).
Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M. & Chang, A. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. proc. Natl Acad. Science. United States 1059457–9464 (2008).
O’Connell, CS et al. Balancing trade-offs: Balancing multiple environmental objectives when ecosystem services vary from region to region. About. Res. Lett. 13064008 (2018).
Lester, SE et al. Marine spatial planning is making room for offshore aquaculture in congested coastal waters. Nat. Common. 9945 (2018).
Fukuyama, F. Political order and political decadence: from the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy (Macmillan, 2014).
Coello, CAC, Lamont, GB and Van Veldhuizen, DA Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems 2nd edition (Springer, 2007).
Lester, SE et al. Assess trade-offs between ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning. March policy 3880–89 (2013).
Hegwood, M., Langendorf, RE, and Burgess, MG Additional video for trade-off analysis of Hegwood, Langendorf, and Burgess. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6087610 (2022).
Plaza‐Úbeda, JA, Burgos‐Jiménez, J., Vazquez, DA & Liston‐Heyes, C. The “win-win” paradigm and stakeholder integration. Bus. Strategy Environ. 18487–499 (2009).
Polasky, S. et al. Where to put things? Spatial land management to support biodiversity and economic returns. Biol. Conserv. 1411505-1524 (2008).
Halpern, BS et al. Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs between social equity, economic return and conservation. proc. Natl Acad. Science. United States 1106229–6234 (2013).
White, C., Halpern, BS & Kappel, CV Ecosystem service trade-off analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple uses of the ocean. proc. Natl Acad. Science. United States 1094696–4701 (2012).
Groot, JC et al. Exploring multi-scale trade-offs between nature conservation, agricultural profits and landscape quality – a methodology to support discussions on land use prospects. Agric. Ecosystem. About. 12058–69 (2007).
Groot, JC, Jellema, A. & Rossing, WA Designing a Hedge Network in a Multifunctional Agricultural Landscape: Balancing Tradeoffs Between Ecological Quality, Landscape Character, and Implementation Costs. EUR. J.Agron. 32112-119 (2010).
Law, EA et al. Fewer and fewer opportunities to mitigate trade-offs between agriculture and the environment in a deforestation hotspot in South America. Biol. Conserv. 262109310 (2021).
Rabotyagov, S. et al. Multi-objective spatial optimization of agricultural conservation practices using a SWAT model and an evolutionary algorithm. J.Vis. Exp. 704009 (2012).
Ruijs, A., Wossink, A., Kortelainen, M., Alkemade, R. & Schulp, CJE Ecosystem service trade-off analysis in Eastern Europe. Ecosystem. To serve. 482–94 (2013).
Tóth, SF & McDill, ME Finding efficient harvest schedules under three conflicting objectives. For. Science. 55117-131 (2009).
Zhou, ZX, Li, J., Guo, ZZ & Li, T. Trade-off between carbon, water, soil and food in the Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region from remote sensing data. Int. J.Appl. Land Obs. Geoinf. 58145-156 (2017).
Yang, W. et al. Trade-offs between ecosystem services in coastal wetlands under the effects of restoration activities. School. indic. 92354–366 (2018).
Lautenbach, S., Volk, M., Strauch, M., Whittaker, G. & Seppelt, R. Trade-off analysis based on optimizing biodiesel crop production for agricultural watershed management. About. Model. Software 4898-112 (2013).
Zhong, J. et al. Analysis of environmental and economic trade-offs in switchgrass supply chains for biofuel production. Energy 107791–803 (2016).
Kanter, DR et al. Assessing agricultural trade-offs in the era of sustainable development. Agric. System 16373–88 (2018).
Bryan, BA et al. Land use efficiency: anticipating future demand for greenhouse gas emission reductions from the land sector and managing trade-offs with agriculture, water and biodiversity. Global. Change Biol. 214098–4114 (2015).
Juutinen, A. et al. Trade-off between economic returns, biodiversity and ecosystem services in the selection of energy peat production sites. Ecosystem. To serve. 40101027 (2019).
Nalle, DJ, Montgomery, CA, Arthur, JL, Polasky, S. & Schumaker, NH Modeling coproduction of wildlife and timber. J. About. Econ. Manage. 48997-1017 (2004).
Burgess, MG, Clemence, M., McDermott, GR, Costello, C. & Gaines, SD Five Rules for Pragmatic Blue Growth. March policy 87331–339 (2018).